Not signed in (Sign In)

Discussion Tag Cloud

Categories

Vanilla 1.1.9 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

  1.  
    Seems to me like he explained what he meant by 'half assed'. Apparently to him your supports seemed like not a lot of time was spent on them. If you did spend a lot of time on them then that's a shame, but a clear indication you may need more practice. You already admit yourself that your experience with custom supports is limited, so why the surprise when someone indicates that your supports aren't looking that great?

    Perhaps it's just me and my cynical attitude, but saying 'half assed' doesn't seem (intentionally) hurtful to me. How would saying 'your supports are crap' be less rude (as you indicate)?
  2.  
    Why should your ride get more points because it was handmade? Why should it be rated as well as an identical ride with better supports...just because you don't have much experience with them? Gotta rate the end product man, and he seems to have fairly rated what you presented to him.

    I don't agree with your reasoning at all, scooterha. Just sayin'.
    • CommentAuthorscooterha
    • CommentTimeDec 15th 2009
     
    i'm not saying my ride should have been rated higher because it was hand made all i am saying is there are much better ways to describe things as half assed if you read what i typed i'm not upset with the scores that part doesnt bother me as i also say in my post its the way he worded he comment its called courtesy. he could have said on the technical side your supports could have used more work, not well your supports were half assed.. to me thats rude and DC i dont think you fully read my complaint you just picked the pieces you wanted to see and then turned into something i didnt say.
    •  
      CommentAuthorXpress
    • CommentTimeDec 15th 2009 edited
     
    Posted By: swervedriverSeems to me like he explained what he meant by 'half assed'. Apparently to him your supports seemed like not a lot of time was spent on them. If you did spend a lot of time on them then that's a shame, but a clear indication you may need more practice. You already admit yourself that your experience with custom supports is limited, so why the surprise when someone indicates that your supports aren't looking that great?

    Perhaps it's just me and my cynical attitude, but saying 'half assed' doesn't seem (intentionally) hurtful to me. How would saying 'your supports are crap' be less rude (as you indicate)?


    Well, lets put it this way...

    *assume* you're a beginner. You spent time working on the ride, hoping people would give constructive criticism, and tell you how to improve upon it to make them better.

    I tell you it's half assed.

    Now how do you feel?
    •  
      CommentAuthorDC High Heat
    • CommentTimeDec 15th 2009 edited
     
    Alright, then if what I said isn't what you meant, then why are "i'm not a pro and havent worked much with the supprts" and "my work was handmade, no tools" relevant? I did read your whole post, and I think introducing what you had to say in that manner gives the impression that I noted in my post.
    • CommentAuthorscooterha
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2009
     
    yes dc you're right all hail you and your engineering degree, your sociology degree, your psychology degree and your human behavioral degree. good day. in any case all in all i thought the original comment was rude and could have been worded differently. i am truly grateful that you guys explained to me what "half assed" meant.. lol
  3.  
    Nope, just logic.
    • CommentAuthorscooterha
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2009
     
    glad we could become fast logical friends :-)
    •  
      CommentAuthorLeFLO
    • CommentTimeDec 20th 2009
     
    Hello everyone. I think I've found a bad rating on the ride "LOCO" :

    "Rated 19 hours, 58 minutes and 45 seconds ago by Kikabom
    Technical : 10.00, Adrenaline : 9.50, Originality : 10.00, Average : 9.83

    It was simply B E A youtiful. The track was really smooth, and the scenery just eye dropping. It was just perfect. (I rode it with the light fog environment - made it perfect). Adrenalinewise, it didnt have any intense parts, but it still maintained an awsome fun speed all the time. What I thought was really clever was the lift in the begining, where you didnt show the lift, so it makes it seem like a real locomotive :). Needless to say, Original as heck, Ive never seen anything like this before.

    AMazing job."

    Well, he says why he rates this track like this, but I don't agree with him, it's just a rating so high.
    I rode "LOCO", and sorry, but I think I'll rate this track with a Five...

    P.S. : Sorry, my english is a bit bad because I'm Belgian.
    •  
      CommentAuthorXpress
    • CommentTimeDec 20th 2009
     
    Posted By: LeFLOHello everyone. I think I've found a bad rating on the ride "LOCO" :

    "Rated 19 hours, 58 minutes and 45 seconds ago by Kikabom
    Technical : 10.00, Adrenaline : 9.50, Originality : 10.00, Average : 9.83

    It was simply B E A youtiful. The track was really smooth, and the scenery just eye dropping. It was just perfect. (I rode it with the light fog environment - made it perfect). Adrenalinewise, it didnt have any intense parts, but it still maintained an awsome fun speed all the time. What I thought was really clever was the lift in the begining, where you didnt show the lift, so it makes it seem like a real locomotive :). Needless to say, Original as heck, Ive never seen anything like this before.

    AMazing job."

    Well, he says why he rates this track like this, but I don't agree with him, it's just a rating so high.
    I rode "LOCO", and sorry, but I think I'll rate this track with a Five...

    P.S. : Sorry, my english is a bit bad because I'm Belgian.


    I agree. His rating is just too high for the track.
  4.  
    The Ganja track on the exchange now was stolen from Hansixx.

    Also, I'm all for some sort of PM system that works on the exchange too...I just got raped by some kid who says my Sabertooth CCI design needs smoothing throughout the track. Apparently he's never seen CCI onrides or pictures. I haven't really said much because I expected people to rate without considering the style, but in this case the comments and score I feel are pretty invalid.
    • CommentAuthorHansixx
    • CommentTimeDec 20th 2009
     
    Yep, Ganja was stolen. and that idiot didnt even bother to rename any of the files included or to alter my track description in the nlpack file...

    I still somehow like the idea of it being uploaded here on the site. I thought about uploading it myself for a long time, but then real life caught me up.... again.
    I think i'll update the cartexture to complement the new NL1.6 standards and then upload it myself in a few days.
    •  
      CommentAuthorXpress
    • CommentTimeDec 20th 2009
     
    I'll agree with DC, we need a PMing system on the exchange, for that exact reason.
    •  
      CommentAuthorEd Boxer
    • CommentTimeDec 21st 2009
     
    This rating has been removed.

    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: LeFLO</cite>Hello everyone. I think I've found a bad rating on the ride "LOCO" :

    "Rated 19 hours, 58 minutes and 45 seconds ago by Kikabom
    Technical : 10.00, Adrenaline : 9.50, Originality : 10.00, Average : 9.83

    It was simply B E A youtiful. The track was really smooth, and the scenery just eye dropping. It was just perfect. (I rode it with the light fog environment - made it perfect). Adrenalinewise, it didnt have any intense parts, but it still maintained an awsome fun speed all the time. What I thought was really clever was the lift in the begining, where you didnt show the lift, so it makes it seem like a real locomotive :). Needless to say, Original as heck, Ive never seen anything like this before.

    AMazing job."

    Well, he says why he rates this track like this, but I don't agree with him, it's just a rating so high.
    I rode "LOCO", and sorry, but I think I'll rate this track with a Five...

    P.S. : Sorry, my english is a bit bad because I'm Belgian.</blockquote>
    •  
      CommentAuthorEd Boxer
    • CommentTimeDec 21st 2009 edited
     
    DC - that rating has been removed.

    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: DC High Heat</cite>The Ganja track on the exchange now was stolen from Hansixx.

    Also, I'm all for some sort of PM system that works on the exchange too...I just got raped by some kid who says my Sabertooth CCI design needs smoothing throughout the track. Apparently he's never seen CCI onrides or pictures. I haven't really said much because I expected people to rate without considering the style, but in this case the comments and score I feel are pretty invalid.</blockquote>
    •  
      CommentAuthorBrookes
    • CommentTimeDec 21st 2009
     
    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: Hansixx</cite>Yep, Ganja was stolen. and that idiot didnt even bother to rename any of the files included or to alter my track description in the nlpack file...

    I still somehow like the idea of it being uploaded here on the site. I thought about uploading it myself for a long time, but then real life caught me up.... again.
    I think i'll update the cartexture to complement the new NL1.6 standards and then upload it myself in a few days.</blockquote>

    Has the track been removed, the one of which the guy stole? Because I rated it, so if Hansixx uploads it is there any way to transfer my rating to it when he uploads it.
    •  
      CommentAuthorEd Boxer
    • CommentTimeDec 21st 2009 edited
     
    Brookes. You will need to re-rate Ganja if and when it is posted.
    • CommentAuthorHansixx
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2009 edited
     
    Just to let you know: Yesterday night i reuploaded Ganja (though only as-is, read the description there).
    http://nolimits-exchange.com/coaster/673/ganja
    •  
      CommentAuthorXpress
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2009
     
    "Rated 18 minutes and 32 seconds ago by Mogeley
    Technical : 8.40, Adrenaline : 9.00, Originality : 9.50, Average : 8.97
    Before I begin a few comments... It's annoying when people upload old rides and mention it in the comments. It doesn't make the ride any better. For many it's an excuse for not doing the work to update the ride.

    WOW! A very well done ride! I liked your tunnels very much! The ride overall is smooth and exciting, with a few unique surprises!

    T - The track work is very good in smoothness and relevance to the elements. The G's go into the yellow several times. There is usually some lateral G's almost always present. It seems the riders in the back of the train were forgotten about. The back has the most extreme G's with 5.1 Vertical G's. The starting section has nice whipping forces ranging from -.7 to 1.0 lateral G's in under 1 second. While this is considered in allowable range it is not pleasant in real life. The track seems optimized for front riders only. The supports worked for me. Though to improve many of the higher supports could use larger tubes and support in more than 2 dimensions. The e-stop also fails if stopped during launch, resulting in a stranded train or a crash into another train. For areas to improve upon there were some "flat spots" where the G's let up a little, and turns where the bank angle adjusts in the middle of the turn. I would have given you a much higher score if it was not for the crash and the overly high G's.

    A - This ride is a blast! I loved the misty tunnels, the inversions, the surprises, the way it was never the same, and how it all mixed together witht he fast pace of the ride. Riding in the back could be a bit extreme as the forces are overly high there.

    O - I felt you did an excellent job making this ride original with many of the track elements, and not just scenery.

    P.S. Much of the added texture content off ride I did not find appropriate. There's no reason to include it. Just be glad your rating only reflected the coaster."

    I felt this rating was unfair. Downrating for "high g-forces" that most would consider perfectly acceptable.
  5.  
    I agree with the rater, and think he has many very valid points and clearly thought-out his rate.
    •  
      CommentAuthorBBSpeed26
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2009
     
    With the exception of the e-stop failure comment, he makes reasonable points. Had he taken off points for the "inappropriate texture content" offride, I would take offense... I mean downloading a ride named Ganja with a huge pot leaf as its logo and not expecting overt drug references is ridiculous. But since that doesn't appear to be reflected in his scores, it seems like a pretty legitimate rate.
    •  
      CommentAuthorXpress
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2009
     
    Posted By: BBSpeed26With the exception of the e-stop failure comment, he makes reasonable points. Had he taken off points for the "inappropriate texture content" offride, I would take offense... I mean downloading a ride named Ganja with a huge pot leaf as its logo and not expecting overt drug references is ridiculous. But since that doesn't appear to be reflected in his scores, it seems like a pretty legitimate rate.


    Well, the pot leaf itself isn't bad. I think they look pretty cool TBH. The pot buds are the inappropriate part ;)
  6.  
    Un layout court mais efficace! Cela nous change des boomerangs habituels. Un Himmelman, un loop et une heartline roll, c'est assez original comme shuttle. La seule chose est qu'il doit être assez brusque, surtout dans l'heartline roll, car il est passé très vite. mais le tout reste fluide, grâce en partie à L'AHG

    I got this rating and I was wondering if I could get a translation. I know that he is saying something about a heartline roll and an immelman spelt: himmelman

    Thanks

    Edit: I went on google but it didn't make much sense
    •  
      CommentAuthorEd Boxer
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2009
     
    In IE, If you select all the text, an "arrow" should appear - right click on the arrow. A menu will appear. Point to the next to last item on the menu - "Translate with Live Search" .

    Its not a perfect translator, but it will give yiou the esence of the rating.
    •  
      CommentAuthorXpress
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2009 edited
     
    "A short but effective layout! This changes the usual two. A Himmelman, a loop and a heartline roll, is quite original as shuttle. The only thing is that it must be quite sharp, especially in the heartline roll because passed very quickly. but the all fluid rest, thanks in part to the AHG."

    Using Bing translator.

    Human translation:

    A short but effective layout! (no idea what the next sentence is meaning) An Immelmann, a loop, and a heartline roll is quite original being used in a shuttle. The only problem i have is the heartline roll, because it was taken very quickly. But all of the rest of the layout flowed very well, thanks to AHG (BTW, I can tell you used Newton, not AHG).
  7.  
    I use Newton and AHG.
    •  
      CommentAuthorXpress
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2009
     
    Posted By: DC High HeatI use Newton and AHG.


    But just because you use both doesn't mean everyone does.

    BTW, why would you use both? Are the bankings/heartline values off in N2, or what?
  8.  
    My point was that you generally can't tell if someone used Newton with or without AHG.

    I have my reasons for using both, and it's not really because of a *problem* with Newton.
  9.  
    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: Xpress</cite>"A short but effective layout! This changes the usual two. A Himmelman, a loop and a heartline roll, is quite original as shuttle. The only thing is that it must be quite sharp, especially in the heartline roll because passed very quickly. but the all fluid rest, thanks in part to the AHG."

    Using Bing translator.

    Human translation:

    A short but effective layout! (no idea what the next sentence is meaning) An Immelmann, a loop, and a heartline roll is quite original being used in a shuttle. The only problem i have is the heartline roll, because it was taken very quickly. But all of the rest of the layout flowed very well, thanks to AHG (BTW, I can tell you used Newton, not AHG).</blockquote>

    Thanks for the rate. That was the first real rate I have gotten[lol] I know it was easy to tell that it was Newton because it was made for a contest and I don't want to spend as much time on it. As for the lift, I was making sure that it would catch on if there was a problem with the other lift.
    •  
      CommentAuthorXpress
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2009
     
    Posted By: devilsrule911
    Posted By: Xpress"A short but effective layout! This changes the usual two. A Himmelman, a loop and a heartline roll, is quite original as shuttle. The only thing is that it must be quite sharp, especially in the heartline roll because passed very quickly. but the all fluid rest, thanks in part to the AHG."

    Using Bing translator.

    Human translation:

    A short but effective layout! (no idea what the next sentence is meaning) An Immelmann, a loop, and a heartline roll is quite original being used in a shuttle. The only problem i have is the heartline roll, because it was taken very quickly. But all of the rest of the layout flowed very well, thanks to AHG (BTW, I can tell you used Newton, not AHG).


    Thanks for the rate. That was the first real rate I have gotten[lol] I know it was easy to tell that it was Newton because it was made for a contest and I don't want to spend as much time on it. As for the lift, I was making sure that it would catch on if there was a problem with the other lift.


    Usually, the boomerang coasters tend to grab the train when it's about halfway onto the lift on the second spike. If there is a problem on the first lift, then it's pretty much screwed lol.
    •  
      CommentAuthorBrookes
    • CommentTimeDec 25th 2009 edited
     
    Rated 5 hours, 24 minutes and 52 seconds ago by Kikabom
    Technical : 9.60, Adrenaline : 9.40, Originality : 9.70, Average : 9.57

    Beautiful Ride. Perfect.

    T - Smooth, nice banking, nice overbanked turns, beautfiful supports

    A - Lots of airtime hills, very fast throughout the whole ride

    O - Massive layout, nice island scenery, original bridge idea, and very nice layout.

    WELL DONE!


    I think this rating by Kikabom on the coaster Flaming Phoenix is a bit high to be honest, I don't think this ride deserves such a high rating.
    •  
      CommentAuthorLeFLO
    • CommentTimeDec 25th 2009
     
    On "Riptide, The Ride",

    "Rated 3 days, 21 hours, 22 minutes and 38 seconds ago by Bruno9467
    Technical : 10.00, Adrenaline : 9.00, Originality : 9.00, Average : 9.33

    Un bon enchainement des inversions.J'aime bien

    Theme,je ne le comprends pas par contre ! Original sûremment ! J'adore le panneau de commande (+1)"

    I speak french, and I can say you that this user didn't explain why he gave that rating to "Riptide".
    For example : "The inversions was greats, 10/10 !" (he said that in the first sentence)

    In the second sentence, he say that he don't understand the theming of the coaster, and he says that it is MAYBE original. (so 9/10, naturally) And, he says that he loves the control panel (I'm not sure of the translation).

    So, do you think that he gave all the reasons of his rating ? For me, he didn't.
    •  
      CommentAuthorLeFLO
    • CommentTimeDec 27th 2009
     
    "Rated 19 hours, 29 minutes and 28 seconds ago by shrza890
    Technical : 5.00, Adrenaline : 5.40, Originality : 7.00, Average : 5.80

    I thought that the layout was interesting, a little slow, but where I felt like you could have done better was with the lift and the ending part, it just seemed kind of unrealistic. If only the track was a little higher and had a few banking and hill adjustments, it woulda been perfect!"

    Hum... That rating on my ride "Chimera" is unfair, I think. Is there nothing good in my ride ? Just elements slows and unrealistics ? Really, I don't understand at all that rating. If the autor could explain me that rating with more precision and arguments, it would be nice.
    •  
      CommentAuthorEd Boxer
    • CommentTimeDec 27th 2009
     
    This rating has been removed.

    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: Brookes</cite><blockquote> Rated 5 hours, 24 minutes and 52 seconds ago by Kikabom
    Technical : 9.60, Adrenaline : 9.40, Originality : 9.70, Average : 9.57

    Beautiful Ride. Perfect.

    T - Smooth, nice banking, nice overbanked turns, beautfiful supports

    A - Lots of airtime hills, very fast throughout the whole ride

    O - Massive layout, nice island scenery, original bridge idea, and very nice layout.

    WELL DONE!</blockquote>

    I think this rating by Kikabom on the coaster Flaming Phoenix is a bit high to be honest, I don't think this ride deserves such a high rating.</blockquote>
    •  
      CommentAuthorEd Boxer
    • CommentTimeDec 27th 2009
     
    This rating has been removed.

    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: LeFLO</cite>On "Riptide, The Ride",

    "Rated 3 days, 21 hours, 22 minutes and 38 seconds ago by Bruno9467
    Technical : 10.00, Adrenaline : 9.00, Originality : 9.00, Average : 9.33

    Un bon enchainement des inversions.J'aime bien

    Theme,je ne le comprends pas par contre ! Original sûremment ! J'adore le panneau de commande (+1)"

    I speak french, and I can say you that this user didn't explain why he gave that rating to "Riptide".
    For example : "The inversions was greats, 10/10 !" (he said that in the first sentence)

    In the second sentence, he say that he don't understand the theming of the coaster, and he says that it is MAYBE original. (so 9/10, naturally) And, he says that he loves the control panel (I'm not sure of the translation).

    So, do you think that he gave all the reasons of his rating ? For me, he didn't.</blockquote>
    •  
      CommentAuthorBrookes
    • CommentTimeDec 27th 2009
     
    Rated 1 day, 2 hours, 44 minutes and 56 seconds ago by DEVILOFDARKNESS
    Technical : 5.00, Adrenaline : 5.00, Originality : 5.00, Average : 5.00

    T: The former half is better. The track is rather smooth and there are good inversions. I wish that the latter half is as good as the former and I suggest that you be patient. There must be smooth patterns in the latter half instead of over-sharp turn. A: I like the layout, but I wish that you are patient enough to make the perfect track. O: very original.

    I think this rate is a little unfair on my coaster Rampage. For one thing I think he hasn't thought much about his ratings as he has rated them all 5.00. In his comments he has put very original then rated originality only 5.00.
    •  
      CommentAuthorEd Boxer
    • CommentTimeDec 29th 2009
     
    This rating has been removed.

    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: Brookes</cite><blockquote>Rated 1 day, 2 hours, 44 minutes and 56 seconds ago by DEVILOFDARKNESS
    Technical : 5.00, Adrenaline : 5.00, Originality : 5.00, Average : 5.00

    T: The former half is better. The track is rather smooth and there are good inversions. I wish that the latter half is as good as the former and I suggest that you be patient. There must be smooth patterns in the latter half instead of over-sharp turn. A: I like the layout, but I wish that you are patient enough to make the perfect track. O: very original.</blockquote>
    I think this rate is a little unfair on my coaster Rampage. For one thing I think he hasn't thought much about his ratings as he has rated them all 5.00. In his comments he has put very original then rated originality only 5.00.</blockquote>
    • CommentAuthorA113
    • CommentTimeJan 1st 2010
     
    Hurricane wrote this on Spez's Son of Beast recreation:

    What a great recreation!

    T - I couldn't spot any flaws, you did what was neccesary, and that was, create Son Of Beast!

    A - Perfect adrenaline fitting what Son Of Beast is actually like in real life!

    O - Now, as it is a recreation, i had trouble finding points in this section for you. However i thought your scenery was great, and your personal touches were good too.

    Well done! Top class recreation.
    --------------------------------------------------
    I don't know, but the rating seems incomplete, and most of the ratings are only really inching toward the category of accuracy. There really aren't specific critique on the tech and adrenaline, and the whole thing is really vague and general.
    •  
      CommentAuthorEd Boxer
    • CommentTimeJan 2nd 2010 edited
     
    A113 and Spez. I just downloaded and rode the track. The rating is too high, the ride is not technically perfect. But the rating in question is not that far off the mark. Additional ratings will bring the rating into a more appropriate range. FYI, I have removed the posts regarding the question as to the report. In the future, please send those kinds of questions via the whisper system initially. Thanks.
    •  
      CommentAuthorDr.gumbo
    • CommentTimeJan 8th 2010
     
    Posted By: LingRated 11 hours, 22 minutes and 47 seconds
    Technical : 9.20, Adrenaline : 8.90, Originality : 7.20, Average : 8.43
    You pulled off a very compelling, exciting ride considering there are no inversions, but the style reminded me a bit too much of Gaia - not a carbon copy, obviously, but I think here there were a few too many similarities, and somewhere you could have gotten creative is inversions. I loved the surrounding area, with lots of realistic details and whatnot to both carry the theme and make the design believable. The colors seemed a bit flamboyant at some points, but overall it was pleasant. The smoothing wasn't superb, but definitely well-done, and as I said, the ride is certainly entertaining, and, especially as it finishes, a rush. Good work.


    This was for Aeris. He essentially criticises the ride for its lack of inversions, and I don't see to many similarities between it and Gaia other than the fact that they both Intamin and over-themed.
  10.  
    Yeah, I was criticised by him almost solely for having a jerky CCI. Someone needs to watch some videos of real rides. Oh well, what can ya do. I did see him leave a pretty good rate on another ride though.
    •  
      CommentAuthorEd Boxer
    • CommentTimeJan 8th 2010
     
    This rating has been removed.

    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: Dr.gumbo</cite><blockquote><cite>Posted By: Ling</cite>Rated 11 hours, 22 minutes and 47 seconds
    Technical : 9.20, Adrenaline : 8.90, Originality : 7.20, Average : 8.43
    You pulled off a very compelling, exciting ride considering there are no inversions, but the style reminded me a bit too much of Gaia - not a carbon copy, obviously, but I think here there were a few too many similarities, and somewhere you could have gotten creative is inversions. I loved the surrounding area, with lots of realistic details and whatnot to both carry the theme and make the design believable. The colors seemed a bit flamboyant at some points, but overall it was pleasant. The smoothing wasn't superb, but definitely well-done, and as I said, the ride is certainly entertaining, and, especially as it finishes, a rush. Good work.</blockquote>

    This was for Aeris. He essentially criticises the ride for its lack of inversions, and I don't see to many similarities between it and Gaia other than the fact that they both Intamin and over-themed.</blockquote>
  11.  
    Stolen (terrible) rate on my Sabertooth coaster. Thanks.


    "T: Very smooth coaster, realistic scenery. Just a nice coaster.

    A: Actually, I didn't think the coaster is that thrilling. The layout is just too apparent.

    O: Not that original. But the way you worked is perfect."
    •  
      CommentAuthorEd Boxer
    • CommentTimeJan 10th 2010
     
    This copied rating has been removed.

    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: DC High Heat</cite>Stolen (terrible) rate on my Sabertooth coaster. Thanks.


    "T: Very smooth coaster, realistic scenery. Just a nice coaster.

    A: Actually, I didn't think the coaster is that thrilling. The layout is just too apparent.

    O: Not that original. But the way you worked is perfect."</blockquote>
    •  
      CommentAuthorDC High Heat
    • CommentTimeJan 12th 2010 edited
     
    http://nolimits-exchange.com/user/1169/stitch59650

    Hello, this user has been taking my environment, changing the file names, and using it without my permission. I'd appreciate if you could take the tracks down and maybe ask him not to use others' work without asking next time. I took a lot of time to get things right with the environment and I'd rather keep it exclusive to my track. Thanks.

    -DC
    • CommentAuthorA113
    • CommentTimeJan 13th 2010
     
    I'm not sure if this counts as a rating complaint, but an exchange upload complaint.

    http://nolimits-exchange.com/coaster/744/caz

    I'm not even sure if the file is an .nltrack file (I'm not taking the risk), and the picture used is one of a prison and the description is 'MUY BUENA' (VERY GOOD).

    Just for the safety of others and as a suggestion to take it off of the exchange.
    •  
      CommentAuthorXpress
    • CommentTimeJan 13th 2010
     
    It's a valid ride, and has no malicious content. Mind you not top grade, it is an NL track ;)
    • CommentAuthormrfeeny
    • CommentTimeJan 13th 2010
     
    can anyone please download the Avenger 2.0 coaster and tell me if it is better than a 5.33? Apparently this coaster is too big/oversized. Considering that it is a giga-coaster and is meant to be that way i feel that this one persons opinion is discoraging other people from downloading my ride. I also apparently didn't put much thought into the layout of this ride which isn't true. It took me well over two weeks to get the final trackwork set and another week to make the supports. I know that this is his opinion and all, but i strongly disagree with it and feel that it is hurting the exposure of my ride. wheather or not you remove it is up to you but i would at least like some other people to rate for themselves it instead of saying, "this guy only gave it a five so it must be a bad ride." Personally, I think it is one of my best rides.
  12.  
    May be frustrating but I don't think the ride will be rated much higher than that. The quality of some of the tracks and trackwork put out is just simply too high to rate this one much above where it is now. There's a lot you could've done to improve it, and you can start with simply adding terrain and some trees. After that, make sure your supports are as similar as possible to those on real rides. I suggest downloading some highly rated rides here and comparing, then using what you learn to improve. Good luck.
    • CommentAuthormrfeeny
    • CommentTimeJan 13th 2010
     
    Terrain is one thing i have been trying to figure out, but with limites success. the reason i didn't terraform was because i am not very good at it and i didn't want to be marked down just becuase of poor looking scenery. I have been trying to find tutorials on how to make underground tunnels and such but i can't find any. If you do know of any instructional videos or other things that will heep me out in this area it would be greatly appreciated. Also i thought my supports were pretty darm accurate to what you would see on a real ride. if you have any suggestions as to what should be changed please share them. I feel that this ride has a lot of potential and i will not give up on it. I will probably update it again (not anytime soon) once i get terraforming mastered and hopefully it can do a lot better.